Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mika Dagan Fruchtman vs Leticia Garcia Vidal Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fruchtman vs Vidal analysis and find out who is favored!
Mika Dagan Fruchtman vs Leticia Garcia Vidal Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fruchtman 1 - 0 Vidal
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fruchtman has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Vidal has won 38.35%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fruchtman, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Vidal has won 56.88%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 40.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fruchtman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vidal has saved 43.4% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fruchtman has won 25% of matches played (W/L 1/ 3), with Vidal winning 51.02% (W/L 25/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fruchtman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 16/ 12), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 37/ 41). Vidal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 48/ 42), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 35% (W/L 8/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Fruchtman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 1/ 3), where as Vidal has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 13/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fruchtman winning 1 times and Vidal being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fruchtman winning 2 and Vidal winning 0. The last match between Fruchtman and Vidal was at the W15 Cancun, 28-09-2022, First, Hard with Mika Dagan Fruchtman getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fruchtman and Vidal have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fruchtman winning 0 times and Vidal 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fruchtman winning 0, and Vidal 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fruchtman has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Vidal has played against players with an average rank of 29.63.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fruchtman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vidal has won 82% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fruchtman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vidal has converted 47.47% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
894
Rank
771
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
50% (53-53)
Career Total W/L
50% (56-57)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
52% (13-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Mika Dagan Fruchtman vs Leticia Garcia Vidal For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Fruchtman VS Vidal
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Mika Dagan Fruchtman | Leticia Garcia Vidal |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:0 | 1:30:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (29/52) | 61% (40/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (22/29) | 45% (18/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 26% (6/23) | 27% (7/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (7/16) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 62% (41/66) | 46% (24/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Leticia Garcia Vidal
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
10
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
26%
(
6 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
24 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mika Dagan Fruchtman | Leticia Garcia Vidal |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 52% (13/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 48% (27/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 49% (259/268) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (13/12) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 14 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.63 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 162 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:18:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 44.36 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 53% (612/1157) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (370/612) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (209/545) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (75/158) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (568/1223) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 54% (13/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 86% (6/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (9/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (9/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (16/4) |
Mika Dagan Fruchtman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kiara Cvetkovic
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michaela Laki
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
21 of
32)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Natsuho Arakawa
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
67%
(
71 of
106)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
6
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Julaluck Sae-Eung
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanni Liu
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Chompoothip Jandakate
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Nikita Liebkind
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
11
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
38 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Natcharee Teerachodjiranon
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simona Ogescu
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
17 of
29)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
13 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
39
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Leticia Garcia Vidal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jazmin Ortenzi
Player
Leticia Garcia Vidal
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leticia Garcia Vidal
Player
Josefina Estevez
51%
(
58 of
113)
1st Serve %
66%
(
96 of
145)
-
Aces
-
14
Double Faults
9
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
49 of
96)
44%
(
24 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
50%
(
11 of
22)
Break Points Won
77%
(
10 of
13)
52%
(
59 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
78 of
145)
132
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(4) 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Candela Vazquez
Player
Leticia Garcia Vidal
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Natalia Sousa Salazar
Player
Leticia Garcia Vidal
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve %
47%
(
42 of
89)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
19
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
26%
(
6 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
6 of
6)
51%
(
40 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 6-7(3) 14-12 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentina Mediorreal Arias
Player
Leticia Garcia Vidal
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
15
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Leticia Garcia Vidal
Player
Esther Vyrlan
49%
(
43 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
6
17
Double Faults
5
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
25%
(
11 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
54%
(
47 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
88
|
0-6 7-6(2) 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Isabella Barrera Aguirre
Player
Leticia Garcia Vidal
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
70)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
13
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Fruchtman Vs Vidal Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Fruchtman are available here and Vidal photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
